Scientology Wages War Against Release of Controversial Documentary Going Clear

The release of "Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief" in 2015 sparked a fierce battle between the Church of Scientology and the film's creators. This documentary, based on Lawrence Wright's book, exposed alleged abuses and controversial practices within the organization. The Church of Scientology launched an aggressive counterattack, attempting to discredit the film and its participants before and after its premiere.

The film, directed by Alex Gibney, premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and received widespread critical acclaim. It featured interviews with former Scientology members who shared their experiences and shed light on the inner workings of the organization. The documentary's success and nomination for seven Emmy Awards further fueled the Church's efforts to suppress its message.

Scientology's counterattack included public statements, legal threats, and targeted campaigns against those involved in the film's production. The organization's response highlighted the high stakes involved in exposing controversial religious practices and the lengths to which powerful institutions may go to protect their image.

Origins and Context of 'Going Clear'

'Going Clear' emerged as a groundbreaking documentary exposing the controversial practices of Scientology. The film's creation involved extensive research and high-profile collaborations.

Development of the Documentary

Alex Gibney, an acclaimed documentarian, directed 'Going Clear' for HBO. The film premiered at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. It quickly garnered critical acclaim and sparked intense public interest in Scientology's inner workings.

Gibney's documentary drew from interviews with former Scientology members. These firsthand accounts provided rare insights into the organization's structure and practices.

The film's production faced significant challenges. Scientology's reputation for aggressively defending itself against criticism added complexity to the project.

Lawrence Wright's Involvement

'Going Clear' was based on Lawrence Wright's 2013 book of the same name. Wright, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, conducted extensive research for his work.

His book delved into Scientology's history, beliefs, and controversies. Wright interviewed numerous ex-Scientologists, including high-ranking former officials.

The book's thorough examination of Scientology provided a solid foundation for the documentary. Wright's involvement lent credibility to the film's claims and helped shape its narrative structure.

His work highlighted the experiences of notable Scientologists and ex-members. This approach offered viewers a compelling mix of personal stories and investigative journalism.

Scientology's Foundational Beliefs

Scientology's core beliefs stem from L. Ron Hubbard's teachings and center around the concept of spiritual enlightenment through specific practices. The religion incorporates a mix of science fiction elements and self-help techniques.

L. Ron Hubbard and Dianetics

L. Ron Hubbard introduced Dianetics in 1950 as a self-help system. He claimed it could cure physical and mental ailments. Dianetics forms the foundation of Scientology's beliefs.

Hubbard's book "Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health" outlines the concept of the "reactive mind." This part of the mind supposedly stores painful memories called "engrams." Scientologists believe these engrams cause irrational behavior and psychosomatic illnesses.

The ultimate goal of Dianetics is to achieve the state of "Clear." This involves removing all engrams from the reactive mind. Scientologists believe this leads to increased intelligence, creativity, and spiritual awareness.

Scientological Practices and Terminology

Scientology employs various practices to help followers progress spiritually. The most prominent is "auditing," a one-on-one counseling session. During auditing, an "auditor" guides the individual through past experiences to identify and remove engrams.

The E-Meter, a device similar to a lie detector, is used in auditing sessions. Scientologists believe it measures spiritual state and helps locate areas of spiritual distress.

Scientology uses unique terminology. "Thetans" are immortal spiritual beings that Scientologists believe inhabit physical bodies. "Operating Thetan" levels represent advanced spiritual states that followers aim to achieve through extensive auditing and study.

The Church's Public Persona

The Church of Scientology carefully cultivates its public image through celebrity endorsements and strategic outreach efforts. These tactics aim to present a positive face to the world and attract new members.

Celebrity Influence

Tom Cruise and John Travolta stand out as Scientology's most prominent celebrity adherents. Their star power lends credibility and glamour to the organization. The Church leverages their fame through media appearances and public statements praising Scientology.

Other notable Scientologist celebrities have included Kirstie Alley and Elisabeth Moss. Their involvement helps normalize the religion in popular culture. Celebrity Centers cater specifically to high-profile members, offering exclusive services and networking opportunities.

The Church actively recruits entertainment industry figures. It views Hollywood as a key avenue for spreading its message and enhancing its reputation.

Public Perception and Outreach

Scientology employs various strategies to shape public opinion:

  • Glossy promotional materials highlighting its humanitarian efforts

  • Free personality tests to attract potential converts

  • Community outreach programs addressing social issues

  • Highly visible buildings in major cities to establish legitimacy

The Church presents itself as a modern spiritual movement focused on self-improvement. It emphasizes its drug rehabilitation and literacy programs to demonstrate societal benefits.

Critics argue these efforts mask more controversial aspects of Scientology's beliefs and practices. The organization aggressively counters negative publicity through lawsuits and public relations campaigns.

Controversies and Accusations

Scientology has faced numerous controversies and accusations over the years, ranging from allegations of abuse to legal battles with former members.

Allegations of Abuse

Former Scientology members have reported physical and emotional abuse within the organization. Marty Rathbun and Mike Rinder, both former high-ranking officials, have spoken out about alleged mistreatment. They claim to have witnessed and experienced physical violence, particularly in the Sea Org, Scientology's elite order.

Sylvia 'Spanky' Taylor, a former member, has described being separated from her child and subjected to harsh working conditions. These accounts paint a picture of a controlling environment where dissent is punished and members are isolated from family and friends.

Financial Scrutiny and Tax Status

Scientology's financial practices have come under intense scrutiny. The organization fought a long battle with the IRS over its tax-exempt status, which it eventually gained in 1993. This decision remains controversial, with critics arguing that Scientology operates more like a business than a religion.

The Church's vast real estate holdings and alleged use of unpaid labor have raised questions about its finances. Former members claim that Scientology pressures its followers to make substantial donations and purchase expensive courses and materials.

Legal Battles and Defectors' Testimonies

Scientology has been involved in numerous legal battles, often against former members who speak out. The organization is known for its aggressive use of lawyers to silence critics. Sara Northrup Hollister, L. Ron Hubbard's second wife, faced legal threats when she attempted to leave the group.

Defectors' testimonies have been crucial in exposing Scientology's alleged practices. Many former members report harassment and intimidation after leaving. The Church has been accused of using private investigators to monitor and discredit critics.

These legal battles have often centered around allegations of fraud, coercion, and violation of labor laws. The testimonies of high-profile defectors have played a significant role in shaping public perception of Scientology.

The Battle to Release 'Going Clear'

The release of "Going Clear" faced significant opposition from the Church of Scientology. The organization employed various tactics to prevent the film's distribution, including legal threats, media campaigns, and attempts to discredit those involved.

Church's Counteractions

The Church of Scientology launched an aggressive campaign to counter "Going Clear." They created websites and videos attacking the film's credibility. High-ranking church officials made public statements denouncing the documentary as biased and inaccurate.

David Miscavige, the leader of Scientology, reportedly mobilized church resources to combat the film's release. The organization contacted media outlets, urging them not to air or review the documentary.

The church also targeted individuals featured in the film, attempting to discredit their testimonies. Former members who spoke out faced intense scrutiny and alleged harassment from Scientology representatives.

Litigation and the Threat of Legal Action

Scientology's legal team played a crucial role in opposing "Going Clear." They sent numerous cease-and-desist letters to HBO and the filmmakers. These letters threatened lawsuits for defamation and copyright infringement.

The church's lawyers claimed the film contained false statements and violated intellectual property rights. They demanded extensive edits and removal of certain content before the documentary could be released.

HBO stood firm, backing the filmmakers and proceeding with the release. The network's legal team carefully vetted the film to ensure it could withstand potential lawsuits.

Media and Advertising Strategies

Scientology employed sophisticated media tactics to counter "Going Clear." They purchased full-page advertisements in major newspapers, challenging the film's accuracy. The church also ran television commercials defending its practices and attacking the documentary's credibility.

Social media platforms became battlegrounds, with the church using targeted ads to spread its message. They created content aimed at discrediting the film's sources and questioning its journalistic integrity.

Despite these efforts, "Going Clear" received widespread media coverage. Critics praised its investigative approach, while audiences showed significant interest in the exposé of Scientology's inner workings.

Critical Reception and Impact

"Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief" garnered widespread acclaim, sparked public debate, and significantly impacted perceptions of Scientology. The film's release led to increased scrutiny of the organization's practices and beliefs.

Acclaim and Awards

The documentary received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics. It premiered at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival to considerable buzz. Major publications like The New Yorker and Rolling Stone praised its thorough research and compelling presentation.

"Going Clear" earned seven Emmy Award nominations, winning three for Outstanding Documentary, Outstanding Writing, and Outstanding Directing. This recognition underscored its artistic and journalistic merits.

Critics lauded the film for its in-depth exploration of Scientology's history, practices, and alleged abuses. Many reviewers highlighted the courageous testimonies of former members featured in the documentary.

Public and Cultural Response

The film sparked intense public interest and discussion about Scientology. It became a cultural touchstone, prompting conversations about religious freedom, cult dynamics, and celebrity influence.

Social media buzzed with reactions as viewers shared their thoughts and experiences. Many expressed shock at the revelations presented in the documentary.

"Going Clear" also inspired other media explorations of Scientology. Books, podcasts, and television series followed, building on the public's newfound curiosity about the organization.

Influence on Scientology's Image

The documentary had a profound impact on public perception of Scientology. It brought long-standing criticisms and allegations into the mainstream spotlight.

Scientology's reputation suffered as the film exposed alleged abuses, financial practices, and treatment of members. The organization's responses to the documentary often backfired, drawing further scrutiny.

Some high-profile members distanced themselves from Scientology following the film's release. This shift in celebrity associations dealt another blow to the organization's public image.

The film's revelations led to increased calls for investigation into Scientology's tax-exempt status and treatment of members.

Scientology's Standing in Modern Culture

Scientology occupies a controversial position in contemporary society, straddling the line between religion and cult. Its influence has waned in recent years, yet the organization maintains a dedicated following and continues to adapt.

Scientology's Adaptations and Resilience

Scientology has shown remarkable resilience in the face of public scrutiny and criticism. The organization has invested heavily in digital outreach, using social media and online platforms to spread its message. It has also rebranded some of its practices, positioning them as self-help techniques rather than religious rituals.

Scientology continues to attract new members through celebrity endorsements and slick marketing campaigns. The group has expanded its presence globally, establishing churches and missions in countries where it previously had little influence.

Despite declining membership numbers in some regions, Scientology's financial resources remain substantial. This wealth allows the organization to maintain its properties and fund various initiatives, ensuring its continued visibility.

The Ongoing Debate: Religion or Cult?

The classification of Scientology as a religion or cult remains hotly contested. Critics argue that Scientology's practices, including "auditing" and the concept of "thetans," lack scientific basis and exploit vulnerable individuals seeking enlightenment.

Defenders of Scientology point to its official recognition as a religion in some countries as evidence of its legitimacy. They argue that Scientology offers a path to spiritual growth and self-improvement, similar to other established faiths.

The debate often centers on Scientology's hierarchical structure and alleged coercive practices. Former members have reported experiences of isolation and financial exploitation, fueling accusations of cult-like behavior.

Scholars and religious experts remain divided on the issue, with some viewing Scientology as a new religious movement and others classifying it as a dangerous cult.

Previous
Previous

Audience Manipulation Blurs Truth and Fiction in Documentary The Impostor

Next
Next

Staged Reality Blurs Truth in Pioneering Documentary Nanook of the North